Tea Party symbols: Forgetting history and science


From the Los Angeles Times blogs, Opinion, from February 2010:

Tea Party footnotes

February 7, 2010 |  7:39 am

A couple of musings about the Tea Party convention in Tennessee:

I’m puzzled by the disgruntled reaction among Tea Partiers to the fact that the convention charged money to attend — about $550, it’s been reported — and that the convention organizer was a for-profit company. Yeah, it’s expensive, all right, but isn’t profit-making quintessentially American?

And I’ve seen photos of conventioneers wearing T-shirts with the image of a bald eagle on the back, the national bird, symbol of the nation. When the Founding Fathers were drawing up the blueprints for the United States, there were hundreds of thousands of bald eagles, coast to coast, clime to clime.

But then humans began crowding them out and shooting them down in such numbers that a law protecting them was put into place in 1940. But that was just about the time that DDT began to be used in vast quantities, and there went the bald eagle population again. DDT in the food chain rendered bald eagle shells too thin to incubate or hatch and perhaps rendered some adult birds infertile.

Rachel Carson’s seminal book ”Silent Spring” raised the public’s awareness of the risks of DDT. In 1967, bald eagles were ruled an endangered species in much of the U.S. — a status that was made national on the nation’s bicentennial, in 1976 — and they weren’t declared to be a thriving species once again until 2007.

Which means that, if it hadn’t been for all those tree-hugging pinko environmentalists, the bird of prey on all those T-shirts, the proud bald eagle, might very well have been a dead duck.

– Patt Morrison

Audubon watercolor of bald eagle - Library of Congress image

Audubon watercolor of bald eagle - Library of Congress image

Help save the bald eagle from Tea Party sniping:

Add to FacebookAdd to NewsvineAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Furl

About these ads

One Response to Tea Party symbols: Forgetting history and science

  1. Jim Stanley says:

    What an excellent take on a couple of things. There have been a number of Tea Party gatherings where it took mega-bucks to get in the door. And I like the author’s perspective. That for-profit exclusivity is exactly the kind of America the Tea Partiers support legislatively. So why object when the cash comes out of THEIR pockets? Especially to hear Sarah Palin? I would think that would be a Tea Partier’s Disneyworld.

    As to the bald eagle, the irony is not lost on me. But the Tea Partiers, like a great many other conservatives, are all about idols and symbols. Less about substance. We’ll splash the bald eagle on T-shirts, but oppose laws to protect them. We’ll wear crosses around our necks, but reject the lifestyle of self-sacrifice and compassion that the cross represents. We’ll put yellow ribbon magnets on our cars to support the troops. But when it comes time to raise taxes to provide the troops with quality health care or body armor, we’ll just whine about government pork. I’m sure Ed has a few ideas about those who idolize the flag as a prop, too. But then support policies that stand against everything the flag represents. That’s the Tea Party movement. Lots of symbols. Zero substance.

    Like

Play nice in the Bathtub -- splash no soap in anyone's eyes.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,150 other followers

%d bloggers like this: