Who ratted out the Republicans like this, and when?


You may wish to file this under o tempora, o mores; or perhaps under plus ça change.  

GOP vs. Dems. Image from Addicting Information.

GOP vs. Dems. Image from Addicting Information, “15 differences between Democrats and Republicans.”

 

Does history repeat itself?  George Santayana said history repeats for those who forget what happened before.

Here’s a political speech given in Minnesota.  Without hitting Google, can you tell who said this, and when?

Democracy does not work that way. Democracy is a matter of faith–a faith in the soul of man–a faith in human rights. That is the kind of faith that moves mountains–that’s the kind of faith that hurled the Iron Range at the Axis and shook the world at Hiroshima.

Faith is much more than efficiency. Faith gives value to all things. Without faith, the people perish.

Today the forces of liberalism face a crisis. The people of the United States must make a choice between two ways of living–a decision, which will affect us the rest of our lives and our children and our grandchildren after us.

On the other side, there is the Wall Street way of life and politics. Trust the leader! Let big business take care of prices and profits! Measure all things by money! That is the philosophy of the masters of the Republican Party.

Well, I have been studying the Republican Party for over 12 years at close hand in the Capital of the United States. And by this time, I have discovered where the Republicans stand on most of the major issues.

Since they won’t tell you themselves, I am going to tell you.

They approve of the American farmer-but they are willing to help him go broke.

They stand four-square for the American home–but not for housing.

They are strong for labor–but they are stronger for restricting labor’s rights.

They favor a minimum wage–the smaller the minimum the better.

They indorse educational opportunity for all–but they won’t spend money for teachers or for schools.

They think modern medical care and hospitals are fine–for people who can afford them.

They approve of social security benefits-so much so that they took them away from almost a million people.

They believe in international trade–so much so that they crippled our reciprocal trade program, and killed our International Wheat Agreement.

They favor the admission of displaced persons–but only within shameful racial and religious limitations.

They consider electric power a great blessing-but only when the private power companies get their rake-off.

They say TVA is wonderful–but we ought never to try it again.

They condemn “cruelly high prices”–but fight to the death every effort to bring them down.

They think the American standard of living is a fine thing–so long as it doesn’t spread to all the people.

And they admire the Government of the United States so much that they would like to buy it.

Now, my friends, that is the Wall Street Republican way of life. But there is another way–there is another way–the Democratic way, the way of the Democratic Party.

Of course, the Democratic Party is not perfect. Nobody ever said it was. But the Democratic Party believes in the people. It believes in freedom and progress, and it is fighting for its beliefs right now.

In the Democratic Party, you won’t find the kind of unity where everybody thinks what the boss tells him to think, and nothing else.

But you will find an overriding purpose to work for the good of mankind. And you will find a program–a concrete, realistic, and practical program that is worth believing in and fighting for.

Now, I call on all liberals and progressives to stand up and be counted for democracy in this great battle. I call on the old Farmer-Labor Party, the old Wisconsin Progressives, the Non-Partisan Leaguers, and the New Dealers to stand up and be counted in this fight.

What clues does that passage contain that it wasn’t said in the past year?  Or was it?

I’ll post the answer in a day or so — take a guess in comments.

About these ads

6 Responses to Who ratted out the Republicans like this, and when?

  1. JamesK says:

    *grumbles* Ed kindly delete that long post of mine. Didn’t notice it was on the wrong thread.

    Like

  2. Jim says:

    Way to go James! Great catch!

    Like

  3. JamesK says:

    And if the government has a responsibility towards social justice, Joe, then you should have no problem with the government doing something about this:

    In income equality the United States now ranks 93rd. Iran, China, and India are ahead of us on that list.

    And of course you’re willing to pay higher taxes to take care of all those babies that you want born and all those mothers you want to force to give birth?

    Because you surely wouldn’t want to, while claiming the mantle of social justice, forget that by demanding what you want you are assuming responsibility for the consequences of it.

    But tell me..where is the pro-life in laws that require women to get ultrasounds? Where is the pro-life in requiring that all stillbirths be investigated as possible murder? And how come your side is oh so pro-life or so it claims to unborn babies..but you’re oh so anti-life in supporting the death penalty and opposing all gun control?

    A woman’s vagina should have more regulations placed on it then an AK-47? Really?

    And when you make abortion illegal and both unborn babies and their mothers are dying in back alleys are you going to take responsibility for that? Because in that situation it will have been you and yours, Joe, that forced their deaths. Are you going to go to all those families and tell them their daughters deserved to die in the name of your religious beliefs? Because I promise you that if one of my female cousins died because of a back alley abortion and you showed up in my town to tell my family that she deserved to die..you wouldn’t get out of town in one piece.

    As Ed correctly said..your side isn’t pro-life..it’s pro-control of women. Your “prolife crowd” is run by a bunch of old white men who just can’t stand it that women are having sex or want to have sex.

    As this shows: http://freakoutnation.com/2013/08/31/tea-party-speaker-sex-isnt-about-fun-if-you-want-to-have-fun-read-a-book/comment-page-3/
    To quote Jerome Corsi of Whacked Nuts Daily: “If you want to have fun, read a book, go to a movie. Sex is about the procreation of children. It’s a sacred responsibility that is meant by God to have men and women commit their lifetime to children.”

    Oh look..its about imposing your sides supposed religious beliefs on everyone else.

    So much for being pro-life.

    Like

  4. JamesK says:

    It was Harry S Truman.

    Like

  5. Jim says:

    Gene McCarthy?

    Like

Play nice in the Bathtub -- splash no soap in anyone's eyes.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,416 other followers

%d bloggers like this: