Veterans Affairs will allow inaccurate history


At the same time the Cleveland Plain Dealer defended inaccurate history in flag-folding ceremonies, the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs announced it would allow inaccurate ceremonies, if the family of the departed veteran requests it, and if the family provides the script. Here’s the news from the Akron Beacon-Journal.

Scripts must still adhere to standards that prohibit racism, obscenity, or political partisanship.

2 Responses to Veterans Affairs will allow inaccurate history

  1. From: kutchsciencefoundation@hotmail.com

    Dear EDITORIALS, Friends of the Science, History, paleontology and Geology,

    If oyu are just waiting to hear for the Hominid Fossils found in the KUTCH, your wish will be copleted very soon in near future! teams are working to get the perfect evidence proofs and soon reach to conclusion to clear the confusions.
    Do not be surprised if you get a good vews of unexpected HOMINID fossil find in the KUTCH of GUJARAT INDIA. Though most of the geologist stick to the darwinian beliefs, But thats not the coplete truth and thats the reality that darwinian theory is not the coplete science of creation of the GOD.
    Many of the geologist are in favour of the New Study Supporting the Idea That Primates and Dinosaurs Coexisted. and Many geologists do stay away from those Geologist but must not afraid of these but dare to read their finding facts too.
    GEOLOGIST opposing those viws must read the BOOK about the hominid evolution, the canals studied of many living primates, ‘Review of Forbidden Archaeology: The Hidden History of the Human Race.’
    Books and Documentry Filming evedenses are avilable for reference ONLy at out Science library geology sections.
    MANY GEOLOGISTS did LAUGH when first news of fossils of GIANTS CROCODILION published very first time just after the KUTCH EARTHQUAKE in 2001. But Now atleast FOUR crocodillion fossil specimens are discoverd from Kutch sediments. Though many have not visited those museum places to see them may be lack of information to them.
    But here is details of those 1) in PANDHROW Mine GEOLOGY MUSEUM at PANDROW – KUTCH @ http://wikimapia.org/#lat=23.6896473&lon=68.7201691&z=14&l=0&m=a&v=2&search=Panandhro
    2) Bharatioya SANSKRITI DARSHAN Museum of BHUJ – SPECIMAN PICTURES MAP AND LOACTION @ http://wikimapia.org/#lat=23.241982&lon=69.6648324&z=18&l=0&m=a&v=2&show=/884307/Bharatiya-Sankriti-Darsan-Museum
    3) specimen is under process of retrieving
    and the 4) the very first and the BIGGEST OF ALL is been destroyed due to lack to understand the preserving the precious fossil treasere.

    MOST RECENT CROCODILLION TOOTH from KUTCH

    GEO ARCHEOLOGICAL LIBRARY LISTING of KUTCH SCIENCE FOUNDATION DIGITAL LIBRARY

    15) 100s of Books of Archaeological library WITH ENCYCLOPEDIA OF ARCHEOLOGY , Forbidden archaeology including Civilisation and DHOLAVIRA video library, INCA, MAYA, EGYPT, INDUS etc.

    16) 100s of Books of Geological Science Library including fossils and DINO fossils complete sets of Photographic libraries INCLUDING Forbidden Geology, ENCYCLOPEDIA OF GEOLOGY. including video library INCLUDING Forbidden Geology video.

    Many doubts were raised when ETV and Bombay SAMACHAR broadcasted the following news, with doubt that the PURVA – Aadi MANAV ancestor was not existing at that time but now the skeleton evidence came out that the ancestor missing link was there at that time before (about 22 to 5.5 million years ago) between 11 and 16 million years ago.

    The partial skeleton of this 13-million-year-old ‘missing link’ was found by palaeontologists working at a dig site near Barcelona in Spain.
    That time matches with the Rameshwarm bridge and RAMAVATAR and Koteshwar – RAVANa History (Tretauga), means Formation of MONKEY and Apes army formation by DEVAs. that will rule out all the doubts raised for the PURVA – Aadi MANAV.
    Hominid Foot prints found in older layers may have been formed later in the geological process but the study of Photomicrographs and infrared photography is required so that to eliminate that there were no signs of carving or artificial markings in or around the prints. A study of microscopic count of sand grains is ralso required so indicating that the material within the prints had been impacted, and created as the result of a force pressing down on the firmament while it was soft.
    These facts show that the prints were made by the natural result of pressure from the human foot, and in no way could have been duplicated by carving nor only the pheneonmena of honeycomb appearance as the study of Photomicrographs and infrared photography can differnciate the compact sand particles under the pressurepoints which are not in honeycomb pattern appearance.
    Many geologists and paleontologists do visit with curiocity of the specimen and the subject but have no background of study of Photomicrographs and infrared photography and its geological/paleontological applications so do not have any clue or chance to study those subjects in that angle of research. unfortunately lack of resourses and facility for such a research.

    Below:- POP of Hominid Footprint and Measuring the Fossil of Hominid Footprint

    Phase Two Fossils: Burroughs Conjecture

    The most cogent explanation of anomalous fossil footprints is perhaps offered by Dr. William Greely Burroughs, of Berea College in Kentucky. Dr. Burroughs conjecture is that a depression in fossil-bearing rock may, long after the original fossils have been formed, be filled with a sediment that in its turn may also become the medium in which the impression of a footprint or the body of a creature is fossilized. When this second period of fossilization is complete the newly formed rock may be indistinguishable from the older formation, and the new fossils may appear to have formed at the same time as those which are much older. Thus, several fossilization processes may wind up looking like a footprint made at the same time. This is undoubtebly the case in many instances, but the theory is lacking in several respects. Firstly, fossilized human footprints have been found deep within rocks that show no evidence of discontinuous formation, not just at the junction of sedimentary layers. Secondly, out of place fossils are often inconsistent not only with the ages of associated fossils but also with the rock strata and the age conventionally ascribed to them.

    New Study Supports Idea That Primates, Dinosaurs Coexisted !!!!

    Sientists have acquired new data supporting the idea that the last ancestor shared by all living primates walked with the dinosaurs more than 80 million years ago. The results came from a new technique used to reconstruct the course of animal evolution.

    Previously, opposing scientific camps estimated that the animal that gave rise to the primates lived as recently as 55 million years ago and as long ago as 90 million years. The newly proposed date is closer to the older end of the range.
    That’s significant because the older estimate, which was derived from studies based on molecular genetics, identifies the earliest primates as contemporaries of the dinosaurs. The younger date, which was based on fossil records, represents a period after the dinosaurs had already become extinct. ‘Our results agree broadly with a molecular estimate [and] contradict widely accepted palaeontological estimates,’ Simon Tavaré of the University of Southern California and his colleagues reported in the journal Nature. Their finding sprang from a scientific collaboration that straddled the fields of biology and mathematics and spanned research centers from California to the Swiss Alps. Working with colleagues from Harvard University, the University of Washington, Chicago’s Field Museum, and institutions in England and Switzerland, Tavaré used a novel mathematical approach to help answer a major piece of the evolutionary puzzle. Past Views The search for the first primate—that is, the last animal to have been an ancestor of all members of the primate family tree—has long intrigued scientists and others interested in humanity’s evolutionary origins. From the oldest known fossil remains of primates, paleontologists have determined that some ancient members of our evolutionary family lived and died at least as far back as 55 million years ago. Fossils alone, however, cannot disclose precisely when members of the last common ancestral species began to segregate into distinct populations that eventually gave rise to the modern array of some 200 primate species. That’s because the fossil record is incomplete. Paleontologists can’t tell how close any particular specimen was to the progenitor of the primates. So, to approach the problem from another angle, scientists in the field of molecular genetics have compared subtle differences in the DNA of living primates.

    Geneticists can tell how recently two species diverged from a common ancestor from information etched in the organisms’ genes: The fewer differences researchers find between two genetic codes, the more recently the species parted evolutionary company.
    Using this method, geneticists have concluded that about 90 million years have elapsed since all living primates shared their last common ancestor.
    Based on such studies, evolutionary biologists such as Pennsylvania State University’s Blair Hedges believe that early primates lived alongside the great reptiles.

    ‘[Primates and other] major groups of mammals evolved for tens of millions of years before the dinosaurs became extinct,’ Hedges said. That mass extinction occurred about 65 million years ago.

    Fleshing out the Fossil Record

    To reconcile the genetics-based date with the comparatively young estimates of paleontologists, Tavaré and his colleagues fashioned an evolutionary tree of the primates as it’s known from fossils.

    Not wanting to depend entirely on what paleontologists have turned up, the researchers then fleshed out the rudimentary tree with educated guesswork. They used mathematical equations to predict how many species of primates are not represented in the fossil record, and to predict when and for how long those species may have lived.

    The resulting model—based loosely on hard evidence but expanded to take into account species that lived and died out but remain unknown to science—suggests that the earliest primate lived about 81.5 million years ago, long before the age of the oldest fossils uncovered by paleontologists.

    ‘Naturally,’ said Hedges, ‘I am pleased with this result because it shows agreement with our molecular-clock studies.’

    Tavaré’s team suggested that the earliest primates might have been small, nocturnal creatures that inhabited tropical forests. But, assuming they did exist that long ago, numerous forms could have evolved prior to the fateful cataclysm that wiped out the dinosaurs 65 million years ago.

    That event, presumably caused by a giant impact from outerspace, didn’t wipe out all primates living at the time, but probably spared relatively few of them, Tavaré theorized. Those primates that survived would have subsequently evolved into myriad species.

    ‘Of course, this is all speculation,’ Tavaré acknowledged. ‘We have not found any fossils in that bin yet.’

    In fact, scientists may never know how these proposed lost kin of ours looked—or be certain they existed at all—unless paleontologists someday recover fossilized remains.

    FROM YOURS Dr.BHUDIA-Science Group Of INDIA.
    President:’Kutch Science Foundation’.
    Founder :’Kutch Amateurs Astronomers Club – Bhuj – Kutch’.
    Life Member:’kutch Itihaas Parishad’.
    http://uk.geocities.com/wildlifeofkutch/
    http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/scienceclubofindia
    http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/kutchscience
    http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/kachchh
    http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/bhuj

    Take your friends with you with Mobile Messenger. Click Here!

    Crocodilion Tooth.jpg

    HOMINID Dimentions.jpg

    HomnidFootPrintPOPmaould.jpg

    Jaw Droping Discovery.jpg

    Like

  2. […] Veterans Affairs will allow inaccurate history […]

    Like

Please play nice in the Bathtub -- splash no soap in anyone's eyes. While your e-mail will not show with comments, note that it is our policy not to allow false e-mail addresses. Comments with non-working e-mail addresses may be deleted.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: