I don’t know about you but I’ve been absolutely riveted by the recent release of records from a break-in at the White Star line. No really, it’s not just a stream of bilge from people who may not be experts but reckon something. Frankly I can’t get enough of hearing about the same claim that one memo by one of the workers on the Titanic project clearly confirms the ship was ‘unsinkable’. This should finally put to rest the biggest hoax of the 20th century, that the Titanic sunk in the North Atlantic. Still there’s always someone who isn’t going to find a bit of a memo quoted out-of-context convincing so it’s worth recapping the clear evidence that the ’sinking’ of the Titanic is a scam.
While attention was on Hawaii, wondering about the tsunami’s effects there, Oklahoma got hit with an earthquake of magnitude 4.1, a big one for such a flat, geologically inactive state (link goes to USGS site).
Most likely there is no connection between the Oklahoma quake and any other shaking on Earth in the past week or so.
The New Mexico paralegal who claims to know more about the law than any federal judge including the Supreme Court has resurfaced here, at this post. He seems bent on making a case against President Obama’s eligibility for the presidency no matter how many fables he has to invent.
Don’t birthers eventually get a good night’s sleep and wake up and wonder why they waste their time on such a loser issue?
Previous posts at Millard Fillmore’s Bathtub:
- “Stubborn Birthers soldier on”
- California court tosses out the challenge
- “Birther Karma: Hoaxers get hoaxed on alleged Kenya document”
- “Birther control“
- Birthers wallow in the gutter
- NBC on the issue (note links)
- Blogger indicted for threats against Obama
- Election certified
- “Fail repeated”
- “6 ways challenges to Obama’s citizenship fail”
Special kind of birther crazy:
Today I discussed legislative craziness, and she was surprised to discover Utah’s wackoes like Rep. Chris Buttars are national, and perhaps international stars of legislative dysfunction. In my e-mail I get notes talking about a silly resolution from South Dakota’s legislature.
Then I stumbled into this: “Utah bill criminalizes miscarriage.”
If it becomes law, women might be well advised to avoid any activity while in Utah, certainly not skiing or snowmobiling, nor hiking or river running, nor even jogging. A woman who had a miscarriage within a week of skiing in Utah would be hard put to provide evidence exculpating her from a charge that her actions caused the miscarriage. The contest of expert testifiers could be tremendously expensive. Colorado, Wyoming, Idaho, California and other states offer all of those activities, but without the specter of a murder charge to women who miscarry later.
No, there’s no excuse for a woman who doesn’t know she’s pregnant.
Yes, I know the bill was designed to punish the bizarre behavior of some people who attempt to induce abortion by physical activity early in a pregnancy. No, I don’t think this bill does that job well, either.
You legislative drafters, take a look at the bill. The language is bizarre, it seems to me — it backs into a law by defining what is not covered. I see some great ambiguities. The bill excuses medical abuse of the fetus — failing to get medical care for the mother, for example, which leads to death of the fetus — but calls into question any action a woman might take in seeking an abortion from a medical practitioner. It seems to me that the bill directly strives to outlaw all medical abortions, though one section says that seeking an abortion is not covered.
Debaters would have a field day with the enforceability problems of this bill.
Oy. From Chris Buttars, the craziness disease has spread to the entire Utah legislature.
Is there a quarantine law in Utah, for people who carry dangerous infections?
- Best description and discussion I’ve seen on the bill, at the New York Times; it confronts head on the chief problem with this proposed law: It criminalizes the activities of a desperate young woman who needs counseling and other help, but does not need to be jailed, nor deserve it:
Lynn M. Paltrow, the executive director of National Advocates for Pregnant Women, a nonprofit group based in New York, said the focus on the child obscured the bleak story of the teenager, who also deserves, she said, empathy from the world, and the law.
“Almost nobody is speaking for her,” Ms. Paltrow said. “Why would a young woman get to a point of such desperation that she would invite violence against herself? Anybody that desperate is not going to be deterred by this statute.”