4th graders in Virginia could learn from their history texts that thousands of African Americans formed battalions in the Confederate Army and fought to save the South, during the Civil War — entire battalions under Gen. Stonewall Jackson.
That’s what the book claims, anyway. It’s fiction. The author fell victim to a hoax.
Kevin Sieff exposed the book in The Washington Post last week. Virginia education officials quickly moved to discourage teachers from teaching the erroneous passages. Some education authorities pulled the books. The incident exposes problems in the textbook approval processes popular in southern states.
If you had hoped textbook craziness was confined to Texas, you know better now.
More:
- Kevin Levin provided some of the best information and commentary about this incident, at Civil War Memory; see especially his rundown of the claims in the book, here
- Robert Mackey blogged about it at the Lede, at the New York Times site; some good discussion
- Valerie Strauss noted the “high irony” that the erroneous book was approved, while Joy Hakim’s outstanding series on U.S. history had great difficulty getting approval; Strauss also relates the history of why southern states have state textbook approval processes (hint: Think, “War of Northern Aggression”)
- The book’s author is not a historian, and conducted research on-line; history experts had not reviewed the book
[…] Earlier story at Millard Fillmore’s Bathtub […]
LikeLike
I suspect we’ll find out here in Texas, soon. My wife is a high school history teacher, using ten year old books.
LikeLike
Sheesh, Dave! That hurts!
Which is worse, to be able to afford to buy textbooks with gross errors in them, or have standards that mislead, but not have any money to buy the textbooks to spread the bad word?
Ouch.
LikeLike
At least Virginia can afford to buy textbooks.
LikeLike
I’ve read of black construction gangs, black teamsters, black cooks, black valets … basically the same chores they did domestically they did for the Army.
But arming tens of thousands of slaves, and teaching them to shoot straight, and teaching them military organization and discipline? When teaching slaves to read was a crime?
NOTE: I have seen a diary extract from an ancestress who armed her household’s slaves to fight off the British in the War of 1812. She not only armed them, she led them.
LikeLike
Kevin Levin’s blog has the best coverage of this issue I’ve seen, Mr. Hanley. I think that’s where I saw that the author had defended her work as supportable . . . but then, she did her research on the internet.
This post of Levin’s at Civil War Memory probably provides most of the best answers to the author’s defense:
Levin’s blog is a great read anyway, almost all of the time. He knows a lot more about most of his topics that I do about mine, and he writes concisely and well. Go take a look.
LikeLike
[…] here’s a story via Millard Fillmore’s Bathtub* about a history textbook approved for 4th graders in Virginia […]
LikeLike
Anyone who doesn’t question whether southerners would really have accepted whole battalions of armed black men hasn’t developed the necessary critical thinking skills to be either a textbook writer or approver, or to be a teacher.
I guess I can imagine a handful of people (but only a handful, even in the South) who so desperately want to believe in the glory of their history that they would uncritically accept the idea that even blacks rallied to their “noble” cause. But…but… OK, I’m speechless now.
Any word on the author’s response?
LikeLike
By way of a business I run, I am forced to travel in some pretty “unreconstructed” circles. I encounter no small number of folks who still believe this — hundreds of thousands of slaves fought for the Confederacy of their own free will.
On the basis of logic alone, this is absurd. And it’s, as Ed points out, historical myth.
True — a small number of blacks did serve in the Confederate military. A very small number. And the vast majority were slaves FORCED to do so. Some went along with their masters, who were officers. They didn’t fight, they polished boots, tended master’s horse, fetched his water, whatever. Others were impressed into service as ditch diggers or other workers. Hardly soldiers.
If a few blacks with pro-slavery sympathies were actual combat soldiers, they were rare in the extreme…and probably Caribbean or European slaveholders themselves.
LikeLike