Gun nuts offensive, even in the unconscious subtext

Found this on Facebook, a poster designed to be clever:

Facebook poster, from National

Facebook poster, from National, featuring guerrilla fighters from the Second Boer War

I like people who use history and historical photographs to inform modern issue debates well.  But I worry sometimes about the subtexts when people use these photos.

For example, who are these guys?  Were they Pinkerton Detectives hired to shoot iron workers at Andrew Carnegie‘s Homestead, Pennsylvania, steel works?  Hatfields, or McCoys?  The deputy sheriffs in Cheyenne, Wyoming, looking out for Butch Cassidy and the Hole in the Wall Gang?  Is it Butch and the gang?  Are these crazed killers, sporting men, officers of the law, or what?

One hopes it’s not a lynch mob from Kansas, or Georgia, or Texas . . .  When the photo’s subjects are unidentified, we might wonder what is the message intended by showing these people; use of the photo implies endorsement, especially absent any disclaimer.  Oh, yeah, it’s quite likely that the person who put the photo up was wholly ignorant of historical context.  But that’s another form of ignorance promotion.  Looking at the list of possibilities I came up with, you can see why I wouldn’t want to promulgate an image that offers endorsement of murderers, thugs, thieves or racists or any combination of that list. turned up 49 uses across the internet (there may be more, just out of TinEye’s view). Using those links, I’ve learned that the photo is of some unnamed Boer guerrilla fighters in the Second Boer War, circa 1899.  Well, there is this wag claiming the photo may be of George Sydenham Clarke.  He’s in the minority.

Would you want these guys representing your political views?  Any of these guys among those who tried to kill Winston Churchill?  Do they want that in their legacy?

I’m pretty sure I don’t want Boer guerrilla fighters representing my views; they were racist (not that the British were any better), they were crude, and they often tended to let bullets speak for them when words would have worked and been much better for all concerned. 

One might wonder what message the group,, intended.

In the screenplay for the great movie, “Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid,” the great William Goldman wrote Butch Cassidy wondering at the collection of hired assassins the railroads sent after him and his gang:  “Who are those guys,” Butch said, several times.

It’s an apt question here.  Who are those guys?  Why would anyone want them representing them?

(And, historically, I wonder whether anyone knows the names of any of these five men; I haven’t found any identification).



4 Responses to Gun nuts offensive, even in the unconscious subtext

  1. Jim says:


    I am having difficulty divining exactly what the lad’s apologia is here. As you are well aware, I am about as familiar with the blogosphere as Glenn Beck is with lucidity. So perhaps I have missed some soaring appeal on behalf of the anarchist view of the 2nd amendment?

    Color me baffled. Because the only case the man seems to be making is, “Ed’s argument is no good.” Why, perchance? “‘Cause. just ’cause.”

    That’s rather like my daughter’s appeal in defense of coloring on the walls with crayon. Is that all these folks have?



  2. Ed Darrell says:

    Is Mark, at Pseudo-Polymath, saying as he should, that the Gun Nuts don’t have a sound argument? Or is he saying it’s okay to hold up terrorists as heroes?

    It’s worth a click over there to see if you can figure it out. He cites lots of other outrageous things, too.


  3. […] Where you go when you don’t have a sound argument. […]


  4. cindy knoke says:

    Well apparently they have a strong need to shoot living creatures. If you take away their guns they won’t be, what…… Because they can’t kill?
    Pathetic really.
    Willy talked about hoisting yourself on your own petards…….just saying!
    Love your blog~


Please play nice in the Bathtub -- splash no soap in anyone's eyes. While your e-mail will not show with comments, note that it is our policy not to allow false e-mail addresses. Comments with non-working e-mail addresses may be deleted.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: