Today, May 16, 2014, a group of yahoos promises 10 million armed Americans will descend on Washington to force changes in government, maybe depose the President, and have other yahoo fun squealing tires, drinking beer, and scaring good folks with the guns they wave.
They’ll be lucky to have a thousand people show up and politely decline to run afoul of the District of Columbia’s gun laws and the concomitant prison time.
If they stay out of jail, it won’t be because the Constitution protects them.
Yes, the Second Amendment says they have — and you and I have — a right to “keep and bear arms.”
Yahoos, true to their yahoo ways, really don’t read the Constitution thoroughly. Otherwise, I suspect they’d be more circumspect.
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court.
Neither the First Amendment nor the Second Amendment excuses treason.
How will today turn out in Washington? There may be some traffic tie-ups. There always are. Anything out of the ordinary, though? Not if citizens use common sense, and stick to the Constitution that protects their protests.
Update: As of Friday afternoon, the rally fizzled. Organizers blamed the rain. Proof that rain falls on the unjust, too?
More:
- Why didn’t more protesters show up? Twitter hashtag discussion, #OperationAmericanSpringExcuses
- Voice of Russia story on the protests
- Rachel Maddow’s pre-protest analysis, “Big nutball day”
- Wonkette has fun with the idea
- By the way, how did George Washington deal with American citizens who took up arms against the U.S. government in protest? A small army and a dozen nooses . . .
Several points about the Second Amendment to the Constitution: the Supreme Court (in 2008) apparently didn’t consider the context of why the Amendment was needed then, back in the 1870s; the term “law-abiding Citizens” is characteristically vague; and it failed to consider rights of people like Eric Martinez (killed at UC-Santa Barbara) to live. The Gun Industry money, with an assist from the NRA, seems to supersede Victim’s Rights. Why is that?
LikeLike
It rained like hell in the early morning.
LikeLike
That’s why readers are regarded as revolutionaries, and why lawyers and teachers are often the first to die in tyrannical “revolutions.”
As Shakespeare warned us: https://timpanogos.wordpress.com/2012/03/10/the-anti-teacher-anti-lawyer-anti-education-anti-math-anti-civil-rights-truth-behind-kill-all-the-lawyers/
LikeLike
Your problem, Ed, is that you are reading the entire document instead of just picking out sentences here and there that suit your fancy.
LikeLike
The Second Amendment says you may keep and bear arms.
Unless you bear them against the U.S. Then it’s treason. Read the Constitution.
LikeLike
“Keep and Bear Arms”
Pretty clear to me that’s not treason, Ed.
You are adept at making up your own stories.
LikeLike
http://twitter.com/kommonKat/status/467268267552555008
LikeLike