March 7, 2012
Here’s a preview of another piece of television that many Republicans hope you will not bother to see, a piece that explains exactly how and why the health care reforms championed by President Obama will help you and millions of others:
Program: U.S. Health Care: The Good News
Episode: The Good News in American Medicine
Journalist T.R. Reid examines communities in America where top-notch medical care is available at reasonable costs and, in some instances, can be accessed by almost all residents. Included: Mesa County, Colo.; Seattle; Everest, Wash.; Hanover, N.H. In Mesa County, for instance, doctors, hospitals and insurers place an emphasis on prevention; and a program that offers pre-natal care to poor women has proved popular.
T. R. Reid’s report started airing on PBS stations in mid-February. If you haven’t seen it, go to this site to view the entire production.
More, resources (suggested by PBS, mostly):
August 30, 2009
Family funerals combine bitter and sweet. A long life well-lived, the grief over loss, getting together with family and friends from eight decades — and then it’s back to work in a jolt.
Trying to stay caught up:
Outrageous insult to Darwin and Constitution in Missouri: Were the parents concerned about the quality of the brass section in the band, or did they really object to a humorous depiction of “the evolution of brass” in 2009, the bicentennial of Darwin’s birth?
They deserve to have their brasses kicked, but the innocent kids don’t.
P. Z. Myers caught the grossest tragedy:
Band parent Sherry Melby, who is a teacher in the district, stands behind Pollitt’s decision. Melby said she associated the image on the T-shirt with Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution.
“I was disappointed with the image on the shirt.” Melby said. “I don’t think evolution should be associated with our school.”
She doesn’t want her school associated with evolution? How about associating the school with the Taliban of Afghanistan? How about associating her school with Homer Simpson’s stupider brother? How about associating her school with backwards thinking, 16th century bad science? How about associating her school with the St. Bartholomew’s Day Massacre and the sort of stupidity that leads religiously-based violence?
Ray Mummert probably got the call to help Sedalia out, and he’s organizing to fight the forces of smart and intelligent people. Comments from residents of Sedalia are shocking in their lack of information, and depressing.
Kids, pay attention in science class: A proud science teacher in Minnesota, and probably some proud parents, too. Tip of the old scrub brush to Pharyngula on this one.
Anybody who complains about this deserves to get their tail kicked with Tom Delay and every Republican who redistricted Texas last time around. (Sen. Ted Kennedy suggested the Massachusetts legislature should allow the governor to appoint a temporary replacement to represent the state in the U.S. Senate in the event of a vacancy, until a special election can be held.)
First Amendment wins again: Kentucky had a law that said the state could be safe from al Quaeda attack only by the grace of God. A judge, noting that it will take a lot of work by a lot of dedicated Kentuckians who deserve credit, and that it’s illegal to make such a claim in law, overturned the law.
Private insurance failed this woman; Medicare would pay for the treatment under some circumstances, but there is no lie opponents to health care reform won’t tell in order to scare people away from the facts. They claim the woman couldn’t be treated under government care, but Medicare pays for the expensive drug in question. Can’t they at least tell the truth?
This is getting depressing. I’m going to go look at mountains.
August 30, 2009
1 Corinthians 12:26, “If one member suffers, all suffer together with it…”
While Tom Delay dances with the starlets, and Jack Abramoff actually does time, isn’t anyone curious about who organizes all the protests against health care reform?
(Lookie here, P. Z. — Christians doing good. Of course it’s not justification for the faith. It’s one hopeful sign in the Sea of Hamhovind idiocy.)
You may also want to see:
August 23, 2009
Can’t see any reason to reform health care in the U.S.? Read this letter to the editor of the Stockton (California) Record:
August 22, 2009
I recently returned from India with my partner (a Lodi resident, born and raised in Stockton), who had hip surgery there because he has inadequate health insurance and could not afford to have the surgery done here. He, by the way, had excellent care there at a fraction of the cost here, including travel.
It is difficult to understand the paranoia of citizens who are blind to the obvious manipulation by politicians and insurance executives. Insurance companies, through their politician spokespeople, continue to succeed in duping Americans into believing they cannot trust the government, while they make decisions based primarily, if not solely, on huge profits. Certain politicians are willing to sell Americans down the river in the hopes of regaining some political ground.
Though the government may not be great at controlling costs, it does not make decisions based only on maximizing profits into private pockets, and it answers to us at election time. Is our faith in our system at so low an ebb that we alone among industrial nations cannot manage this? Insurance companies act only for themselves.
Me? I trust the government over insurance companies any day. Common sense tells us we need reform, we need it now, and it must address the inequalities of a system that is inherently untrustworthy due to greed and selfish motivation. A real, functional public option is key to meaningful reform.
Need health care? Insurance company won’t authorize your treatment? Just fly to India.
It’s the “India Option Plan” from Sen. Chuck Grassley. Claims that health care in the U.S. is the “best in the world” need to be qualified: Best in the world for those fortunate enough to have insurance that will cover treatment, and which won’t drop them when the bills start coming in; for others, second-world and third-world coverage is reality.
August 23, 2009
Sad story out of Oregon, but a familiar story to anyone who has followed health care issues during any part of the past 40 years: A woman gets cancer, her physician recommends a pharmaceutical or surgical procedure, but the insurance company denies coverage.
In this case, the story is being pushed by opponents to health care reform as a scare tactic. ‘Health care reform means cancer-fighting drugs won’t be covered.’ The tenuous link to reality this argument has is this: The woman is insured by Oregon’s public insurance alternative, a one-state effort to do what private insurance failed to do. So, the critics reason, if she can’t get coverage under Oregon’s public plan, no one will get coverage under any government plan.
The pharmaceutical is a recently-developed cancer fighter, Tarceva.
It’s a crude bluff. Reality is different.
- Medicare may pay for coverage of the drug in question, Tarceva. The Oregon public program has a rather high standard for coverage — 5% chance of survival for 5 months or more, established in clinical trials — but Medicare supplemental insurance plans, a federal program, will pay for Tarceva for non-small cell lung cancer treatments. Oregon’s program may not be equivalent to the federal program proposed.
- Private insurance companies often deny coverage for cancer treatments. The story from Oregon shows the disparities in care, and it demonstrates well that rationing of health care is a key feature of the current system, a key reason to work for reform. But denial of coverage occurs across the nation, and, I think statistics would show, more often from private insurance companies, often for less judicious reasons. In Kansas, Mary Casey got the rejection from her private insurance company: “But when Casey went to fill her Tarceva prescription at the pharmacy, her insurer, Coventry Health Care of Kansas, denied her coverage for the drug, saying it considered Tarceva experimental in her case, even though Tarceva is FDA approved for other lung and pancreatic cancers.” There is no significant difference between private coverage and the Oregon public plan.
- Private insurance failed: This woman is on the Oregon plan because private insurance didn’t provide any coverage for her.
Barabara Wagner’s story troubles anyone with a heart. It’s not an argument against reforming health care and health care insurance, however, because Wagner wouldn’t be alive to this point without a government plan in Oregon, analogous to the public option proposed in the House bill; because private insurance does not differ significantly in its coverage of cancer victims; and because this woman is on a public program in the first place because private insurance simply failed to cover her at all. Under private insurance, this woman would have been dead months ago, if not longer.
August 22, 2009
Odd observation: Electronic searches of H.R. 3200, ‘”America’s Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009,” find that the word “death” occurs only twice in the bill, on pages 588 and 596.
On page 588, the reference is to fines to a “skilled nursing facility” for lapses in care that result in the death of a patient. On page 596, again the reference is to a fine to a nursing facility for a lapse in care that results in the death of a patient.
In each case in which the word “death” occurs, the context is a fine for causing death.
The word “mortality” occurs once, on page 620. It occurs in a section that requires the Secretary of Health and Human Services to set priorities in national health care quality improvement, and to give priority to ideas that “have the greatest potential to decrease morbidity and mortality in this country, including those that are designed to eliminate harm to patients.”
In the only case in which “mortality” occurs, the context calls for reducing mortality.
Don’t take my word for it. Go search the bill yourself.
Critics appear not to have read the bill. When writing fiction, sometimes it’s best not to be bound by reality. However, when one is not bound by reality, one is writing only fiction.