Education spending, per pupil, apples to apples

Utah rejected education vouchers last November, so the release from the Census bureau at the first of April probably got overlooked as not exactly important — I saw no major story on it in any medium.

Education spending chart from U.S. Census BureauMaybe it was the April 1 release date.

Whatever the reason for the lack of recognition, the figures are out from the Census Bureau, and Utah’s at the bottom end of spending per student lists, in the U.S. I wrote earlier that Utah gets a whale of a bargain, since teachers work miracles with the money they have. But miracles can only go so far. Utah’s educational performance has been sliding for 20 years. Investment will be required to stop the slide.

Utah’s per pupil spending is closer to a third that of New York’s.

Of course, spending levels do not guarantee results. New York and New Jersey lead the pack, but the District of Columbia comes in third place. Very few people I know would swap an education in Idaho, Utah or Arizona, the bottom three in per pupil spending, for an education in D.C.

Public Schools Spent $9,138 Per Student in 2006

School districts in the United States spent an average of $9,138 per student in fiscal year 2006, an increase of $437 from 2005, according to a U.S. Census Bureau report released today.

Public Education Finances: 2006 offers a comprehensive look at the revenues and expenditures of public school districts at the national and state levels. The report includes detailed tables that allow for the calculation of per pupil expenditures. Highlights from these tables include spending on instruction, support services, construction, salaries and benefits of the more than 15,000 school districts. Public school districts include elementary and secondary school systems.

All the census statistics are on-line, for free. Policy makers can mine these data for insights — will they? You may download the data in spreadsheet or comma-delimited data form.

The rest of the press release is pure policy talking points:

  • Public school systems received $521.1 billion in funding from federal, state and local sources in 2006, a 6.7 percent increase over 2005. Total expenditures reached $526.6 billion, a 6 percent increase. (See Table 1.)
  • State governments contributed the greatest share of funding to public school systems (47 percent), followed by local sources (44 percent) and the federal government (9 percent). (See Table 5.)
  • School district spending per pupil was highest in New York ($14,884), followed by New Jersey ($14,630) and the District of Columbia ($13,446). States where school districts spent the lowest amount per pupil were Utah ($5,437), Idaho ($6,440) and Arizona ($6,472). (See Tables 8 and 11.)
  • Of the total expenditures for elementary and secondary education, current spending made up $451 billion (85.7 percent) and capital outlay $59 billion (11.2 percent). (See Table 1.)
  • From current spending, school districts allotted $271.8 billion to elementary and secondary instruction. Of that amount, $184.4 billion (68 percent) went to salaries and $58.5 billion went to employee benefits (22 percent). Another $156 billion went to support services. (See Table 6.)
  • Of the $156 billion spent on support services, 28 percent went to operations and maintenance, and 5 percent went to general administration. Of the states that used 10 percent or more of their support services on general administration expenditures, North Dakota topped the list at 14 percent. General administration includes the activities of the boards of education and the offices of the superintendent. (See Table 7.)
  • Of the $59 billion in capital outlay, $45 billion (77 percent) was spent on construction, $5 billion (8 percent) was spent on land and existing structures, and $8.7 billion (15 percent) went to equipment. (See Table 9.)
  • State government contributions per student averaged $5,018 nationally. Hawaii had the largest revenue from state sources per pupil ($13,301). South Dakota had the least state revenue per student ($2,922). (See Table 11.)
  • The percentage of state government financing for public education was highest in Hawaii (89.9 percent) and lowest in Nebraska (31.4 percent). (See Table 5.)
  • The average contribution per pupil from local sources was $4,779, with the highest amount from the District of Columbia ($16,195), which comprises a single urban district (and therefore does not receive state financing). The state with the smallest contribution from local sources was Hawaii ($265). (See Table 11).
  • The percentage of local revenue for school districts was highest in Illinois (59.1 percent) and lowest in Hawaii (1.8 percent). (See Table 5.)
  • On average, the federal government contributed $974 per student enrolled in public school systems. Federal contributions ranged from $2,181 per student in Alaska to $627 in Nevada (See Table 11).
  • The percentage of public school system revenues from the federal government was highest in Mississippi (20.1 percent) and lowest in New Jersey (4.3 percent). (See Table 5.)
  • Spending on transportation represented 12.4 percent of support services. New York and West Virginia spent the largest percent from support services on transportation (21 percent). Hawaii (5.4 percent) and California (7.2 percent) spent the least. (See Table 7.)
  • Total school district debt increased by 8.5 percent from the prior year to $322.7 billion in fiscal year 2006. (See Table 10.)

8 Responses to “Education spending, per pupil, apples to apples”

  1. Nick Kelsier Says:

    And once again Jeff focuses on one little thing in his attempt to bash unions while ignoring all the other variables that are at play when it comes to education funding.

    But tell me, Jeff, if you could make $35,000 a year teaching or $60,000+ a year doing some other job that has the same educational level requirements which would you choose?

    Because I have 5 relatives that are teachers now or are retired teachers. All were part of the teachers union in my state. And yet I make more then all of them. And I am 5 years younger then the youngest of them and near 50 years younger then the oldest of them.

  2. Ed Darrell Says:

    As if “the unions” got any of the increase.

    Unions? In education? Most states don’t allow them. Do you also worry about purple people eaters?

    These statistics are straight up, from the U.S. Census Bureau. Jeff, you demonstrate once again the lengths to which people will go to deny the simple facts.

  3. Jeff Says:

    Eh dishonesty on this topic as usual- the unions are problem as spending on K-12 education has nearly quadrupled in constant dollars since 1950…

  4. Ed Darrell Says:

    Is it? Which dollar gives society the biggest bang for the buck?

    Which dollar spent is an investment in the future? Which one is 100% waste, by Phil Crosby’s definitions of quality?

    Which dollar is likely to produce more returns in the form of increased tax revenue?

    The toughest question is this: On which side of the ledger does money being spent mean no money has to be spent on the other side?

  5. moneyman Says:

    If you think for a minute, per capita spending on prisoners has to be higher than per capita spending on students. Students are in school for ~8 hours while prisoners are in prison for 24 hours — including weekends. So spending 3x more per prisoner while providing meals and medical? Thats darn efficient.

  6. bernarda Says:

    Another report on prison spending with some comparisons to education spending.

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/05/04/AR2008050402054_pf.html

    “Between 1987 and last year, states increased their higher education spending by 21 percent, in inflation-adjusted dollars, according to the Pew Center on the States. During the same period, spending on corrections jumped by 127 percent.

    In the Northeastern states, according to the Pew report, prison spending over the past 20 years has risen 61 percent, while higher education spending has declined by 5.5 percent.”

  7. bernarda Says:

    Just a few examples, New York and Arizona spend three times more on a prisoner than a student. Utah spends four times more on a prisoner.

  8. bernarda Says:

    Even the lowest spending states spend more than that on incarceration.

    “Though the Northeast boasts the lowest
    incarceration rates, it has the highest costs
    per prisoner, led by Rhode Island ($44,860),
    Massachusetts ($43,026) and New York
    ($42,202). The lowest costs are generally in
    the South, led by Louisiana ($13,009),
    Alabama ($13,019) and South Carolina
    ($13,170).”

    http://www.pewtrusts.org/uploadedFiles/wwwpewtrustsorg/Reports/State-based_policy/PSPP_prison_projections_0207.pdf

    “The central questions are ones of
    effectiveness and cost. Total national
    spending on corrections has jumped to more
    than $60 billion from just $9 billion in 1980, and yet recidivism rates have barely changed.
    More than half of released prisoners are back
    behind bars within three years.”

    I would think there would be better ways of spending money.

Leave a Reply