Why Rats, Lice and History is a great book


Gerald Weissman wrote a solid review of Hans Zinsser’s Rats, Lice and History in the journal Emerging Infectious Diseases. The review appeared two years ago, but I just found it.

It’s hard nowadays to reread the work of de Kruif or Sinclair Lewis without a chuckle or two over their quaint locution, but Zinsser’s raffiné account of lice and men remains a delight. Written in 1935 as a latter-day variation on Laurence Sterne’s The Life and Opinions of Tristam Shandy, Zinsser’s book gives a picaresque account of how the history of the world has been shaped by epidemics of louseborne typhus. He sounded a tocsin against microbes in the days before antibiotics, and his challenge remains meaningful today: “Infectious disease is one of the few genuine adventures left in the world. The dragons are all dead and the lance grows rusty in the chimney corner. . . . About the only sporting proposition that remains unimpaired by the relentless domestication of a once free-living human species is the war against those ferocious little fellow creatures, which lurk in dark corners and stalk us in the bodies of rats, mice and all kinds of domestic animals; which fly and crawl with the insects, and waylay us in our food and drink and even in our love”

If you’ve not read Zinsser’s book, this review will give you lots of reasons why you should.  They don’t write history like this for high schools, though they should:

Despite the unwieldy subtitle “Being a study in biography, which, after twelve preliminary chapters indispensable for the preparation of the lay reader, deals with the life history of TYPHUS FEVER,” Rats, Lice and History became an international critical and commercial success. Zinsser’s romp through the ancient and modern worlds describes how epidemics devastated the Byzantines under Justinian, put Charles V atop the Holy Roman Empire, stopped the Turks at the Carpathians, and turned Napoleon’s Grand Armée back from Moscow. He explains how the louse, the ubiquitous vector of typhus, was for most of human history an inevitable part of existence, “like baptism, or smallpox”; its habitat extended from hovel to throne. And after that Murder in the Cathedral, the vectors deserted Thomas à Becket: “The archbishop was murdered in Canterbury Cathedral on the evening of the twenty-ninth of December [1170]. The body lay in the Cathedral all night, and was prepared for burial on the following day…. He had on a large brown mantle; under it, a white surplice; below that, a lamb’s-wool coat; then another woolen coat; and a third woolen coat below this; under this, there was the black, cowled robe of the Benedictine Order; under this, a shirt; and next to the body a curious hair-cloth, covered with linen. As the body grew cold, the vermin that were living in this multiple covering started to crawl out, and, as … the chronicler quoted, ‘The vermin boiled over like water in a simmering cauldron, and the onlookers burst into alternate weeping and laughter …'”

Add to FacebookAdd to NewsvineAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Furl

6 Responses to Why Rats, Lice and History is a great book

  1. Ed Darrell says:

    P.S. to visitors from The Blaze:

    1. It’s a gun owner’s responsibility to comply with the gun ownership laws of the jurisdiction in which she or he happens to be, just as all drivers must comply with local traffic laws.

    2. The 10th Amendment, with the 9th, and the concept of federalism, make it possible for New York to have gun laws that differ from those in California, or Texas, or Oklahoma. It’s humorous that Tea Partiers love the 10th Amendment and federalism, until one of their own gets arrested for violating a state law — then the Tea Partiers wonder why the federal rules don’t make it impossible for New York to have laws that differ from other states. Sure, the charges are too stiff under the circumstances, but if Mark Meckler wer up on his gun laws as he should be, he’d know better, especially if he’s got a permit to carry (which should require some significant education on how laws differ from jurisdiction to jurisdiction).

    Like

  2. Bob VanDeHey says:

    A Wonderful Book: I read it about the age of 15 and then about two decades later. The great and sad influence of these pests upon human history is absolutely astounding (for want of a better word since this generation has overused “awesome”).

    I suggest MFB, already in the bogus history business, expand operations to debunking bogus psuedo-science.

    If ya’all do so, here’s a great place to start:

    http://www.junkscience.com/ddtfaq.html

    (and further below is some Wikipedia info on DDT)

    you could create an affiliate website and call it:
    RachelCarson’sConscience.com

    With DDT (which can safely be drunk and used as salad oil, but tastes pretty rank) you are attacking mosquitoes, ticks, lice, and fleas and by extension controlling or eradicating: malaria, typhus, bubonic plague, yellow fever, dengue fever, sleeping sickness, west nile, encephalitis, lyme disease, rocky mountain fever, Q-fever, Tularemia, spotted fever, meningoencephalitis, hemorrhagic fever and relapsing fever to name a few rather nasty customers which are far less-prevalent where DDT is fashionable. A curious sidebar: worm and even tapeworm eggs can be transmitted from animals like rats to human beings by fleas, lice, and ticks. Wow!

    from Wikipedia:

    “There are no substantial scientific studies so far which prove that DDT is particularly toxic to humans or other primates, compared to other widely-used pesticides. DDT can be applied directly to clothes and used in soap, with no demonstrated ill effects. Indeed, DDT has on rare occasions been administered orally as a treatment for barbiturate poisoning.”

    “Malaria afflicts between 300 million and 500 million people every year. The World Health Organization estimates that around 1 million people die of malaria and malaria-related illness every year. About 90% of these deaths occur in Africa, mostly to children under the age of 5. The economic impact includes costs of health care, working days lost due to sickness, days lost in education, decreased productivity due to brain damage from cerebral malaria, and loss of investment and tourism.”

    “Residual house spraying involves the treatment of all interior walls and ceilings with insecticide, and is particularly effective against mosquitoes, which favour indoor resting before or after feeding. Advocated as the mainstay of malaria eradication programmes in the late 1950s and 1960s, DDT remains a major component of control programmes in southern African states, though many countries have abandoned or curtailed their spraying activities. Swaziland, Mozambique and Ecuador are examples of countries that have very successfully reduced malaria infestations with DDT.”

    “At the same time, use of DDT as an agricultural insecticide was often unrestricted, and restrictions were often evaded, especially in developing coutries where malaria is rife, so that resistance continued to grow. This has generated two related controversies. The first, involving debate among professionals working on malaria control concerns the appropriate role of DDT. The range of disagreement here is relatively small. Few believe either that large scale spraying should be resumed or that the use of DDT should be abandoned altogether. The debate focuses on the relative merits of DDT and alternative pesticides as well as complementary use of interior wall spraying and insecticide-treated bednets.

    “A recent editorial in the British Medical Journal argues that the campaign against malaria is failing, that funding of malaria control should therefore be increased, and that use of DDT should be considered since DDT has ‘a remarkable safety record when used in small quantities for indoor spraying in endemic regions.'”

    “After South Africa stopped using DDT in 1996, the number of malaria cases in KwaZulu Natal province rose from 8,000 to 42,000 cases. By 2000, there had been an approximate 400% increase in malaria deaths. Today, thanks to DDT, the number of deaths from malaria in the region is less than 50 per year. South Africa could afford and did try newer alternatives to DDT, but they proved less effective. Uganda also began permitting the use of DDT in anti-malarial efforts, despite a threat that its agricultural exports to Europe could be banned if they were contaminated with DDT. The Ugandan government has stated that it cannot achieve its development goals without first eliminating malaria. The GDP shows a striking correlation between malaria and poverty, where malaria is estimated to reduce per capita growth by 1.3 percent per annum.”

    “Malaria cases increased in South America after countries in that continent stopped using DDT. Only Ecuador, which has continued to use DDT, has seen a reduction in the number of malaria cases in recent years. Other mosquito-borne diseases are also on the rise. Until the 1970s, DDT was used to eradicate the Aedes aegypti mosquito from most tropical regions of the Americas. The reinvasion of Aedes aegypti since has brought devastating outbreaks of dengue fever, dengue hemorrhagic fever, and a renewed threat of urban yellow fever.”

    Like

  3. bernarda says:

    ““like baptism, or smallpox”” Now that is funny!

    Like

  4. Onkel Bob says:

    And another one on that subject, Justinian’s Flea by William Rosen. (ISBN-10: 0670038555) Few people realize that the plague of 1347 was the second go around for the bubonic plague. Justinian’s plague had far more consequences than the later one. The plague of 540-600 probably hindered European social progression for 500 years.
    Although I do not have much up on the plague, I have some of the images from Ravenna and San Vitale up on the web. I put the link on my name. Of particular interest is the dome of heaven and the mystic lamb. This icon and subsequent martyr motif was very popular during a time when people believed the world was coming to an end.
    BTW- I don’t have images of Galla Placida up because I have no images from that monument where I own exclusive copyright. I bought a set of tourist slides and have scanned them, but only use them in lectures. I mention that because it was also a period of social turmoil.

    Like

  5. Bug Girl says:

    I have always loved this book. :)
    I’ve even plugged it on the bug blog:

    Mummified Lice

    Like

Please play nice in the Bathtub -- splash no soap in anyone's eyes. While your e-mail will not show with comments, note that it is our policy not to allow false e-mail addresses. Comments with non-working e-mail addresses may be deleted.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.