Where’s a conspiracy theorist when you need one?


1 Corinthians 12:26, “If one member suffers, all suffer together with it…”

While Tom Delay dances with the starlets, and Jack Abramoff actually does time, isn’t anyone curious about who organizes all the protests against health care reform?

(Lookie here, P. Z. — Christians doing good.  Of course it’s not justification for the faith.  It’s one hopeful sign in the Sea of Hamhovind idiocy.)

You may also want to see:

5 Responses to Where’s a conspiracy theorist when you need one?

  1. Nick Kelsier says:

    This is directed at Lady and Rocket if they’re still hanging around. Defend the following if you can, I haven’t had Conservative Head on a Plate in such a long time:

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/07/AR2009090702455_2.html?hpid=topnews

    When Your Insurer Says You’re No Longer Covered
    Firms Defend ‘Rescissions’ as Fraud Control

    By Karl Vick
    Washington Post Staff Writer
    Tuesday, September 8, 2009

    LOS ANGELES — The untimely disappearance of Sally Marrari’s medical coverage goes a long way toward explaining why insurance companies are cast as the villain in the health-care reform drama.

    “They said I never mentioned I had a back problem,” said Marrari, 52, whose coverage with Blue Cross was abruptly canceled in 2006 after a thyroid disorder, fluid in the heart and lupus were diagnosed. That left the Los Angeles woman with $25,000 in medical bills and the stigma of the company’s claim that she had committed fraud by not listing on a health questionnaire “preexisting conditions” Marrari said she did not know she had.

    By the time she filed a lawsuit in 2008, she also got a diagnosis of pancreatic cancer and her debts had swelled beyond $200,000. She was able to see a specialist by trading office visits for work on the doctor’s 1969 Porsche at the garage she owns with her husband.

    “I’ve had about 10 visits,” Marrari said of the barter arrangement that has proved more reliable than her insurance. “The car needs a lot of work.”

    Rescission — the technical term for canceling coverage on grounds that the company was misled — is often considered among the most offensive practices in an insurance industry that already suffers from a distinct lack of popularity among the American public. Tales of cancellations have fueled outrage among regulators, analysts, doctors and, not least, plaintiffs’ lawyers, who describe insurers as too eager to shed patients to widen profits.

    Those sentiments have become central to the health-care debate, as President Obama tries to tap into dissatisfaction with the insurance industry to build support for reform efforts. Each of the bills pending in Congress would prevent insurers from rejecting clients because of preexisting conditions.

    No one claims to know how often policies are canceled — in large part, congressional investigators say, because insurance companies are regulated by a patchwork of state laws and policies. But the practice is common enough to spur lawsuits and state regulatory action.

    In the past 18 months, California’s five largest insurers paid almost $19 million in fines for marooning policyholders who had fallen ill. That includes a $1 million fine against Health Net, which admitted offering bonuses to employees for finding reasons to cancel policies, according to company documents released in court.

    “This is probably the most egregious of examples of health insurers using their power and their resources to deny benefits to people who are most in need of care,” said Gerald Kominski, associate director of the Center for Health Policy Research at the University of California at Los Angeles. “It’s really a horrendous activity on the part of the insurers.”

    Insurance company officials say they need to be able to cancel policies to control fraud, which by some estimates reaches $100 billion annually.

    “We do not rescind a policyholder’s coverage because someone on the policy gets sick,” said Peggy Hinz, a spokeswoman for Anthem Blue Cross, a subsidiary of WellPoint. “We have put in place a thorough process with multiple steps to ensure that we are as fair and as accurate as we can be in making these difficult decisions.”

    Much of that process was a condition of settlements with state overseers, who fined Blue Cross $11 million over the past two years and required it, and all other major insurers in California, to restore canceled policies. Insurers still face court challenges, including a class-action suit targeting Blue Cross on behalf of 6,000 canceled policyholders.

    Like

  2. Nick Kelsier says:

    And yet, Donna, you’re already paying for it by paying for higher insurance premiums and higher taxes to cover the emergency care of all those who don’t have insurance.

    So…take your pick. Pay more now or more then likely pay less later.

    Like

  3. Ed Darrell says:

    Right, Mike. But recently he’s noted many times when the note that “Christians are involved” only means that craziness has set in.

    This is one small instant where Christian involvement doesn’t mean that.

    Donna, we didn’t start the fire.

    Like

  4. Donna B. says:

    Makes ya wonder how a good agnostic like myself would be against the current iteration of health care reform.

    It’s the massive spending that lit the fire, health care reform without a way to pay for it added fuel.

    Like

  5. Hey, Ed. PZ has never said that Christians don’t do good things. His position has been that if they do good things it doesn’t prove the existence of God, and that they would also be inspired to do things if another community institution besides church inspired or collectively induced them to do so.

    Like

Please play nice in the Bathtub -- splash no soap in anyone's eyes. While your e-mail will not show with comments, note that it is our policy not to allow false e-mail addresses. Comments with non-working e-mail addresses may be deleted.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.