Getting to the Guns of August: July 28, 1914, Austria declared war on Serbia
Wikipedia photo and caption: Austro-Hungarian troops executing captured Serbians, 1917. Serbia lost about 850,000 people during the war, a quarter of its pre-war population.
According to the Associated Press, today is the anniversary of the declaration of war that really got World War I started: Austria declared war on Serbia on July 28, 1914.
Serbian nationalists assassinated Austrian Crown Prince Franz Ferdinand and his wife Sofie in Sarajevo, the traditional Serbian capital then held by Austria, the previous June. After a summer of demands on Serbia by Austria, which Serbia could not or would not meet, Austria declared war.
This entry was posted on Thursday, July 28th, 2011 at 7:32 pm and is filed under History, World War I. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
6 Responses to Getting to the Guns of August: July 28, 1914, Austria declared war on Serbia
Ed, I’m not sure how long ago this was. It was part of a huge exhibit of Sargent’s works at the BMFA. I’m thinking maybe 15 years ago? As an aside, I wish I were there. There’s a Chihuly exhibit going on right now.
Sargent was commissioned to do a painting to be part of an exhibit at the then planned Hall of Remembrance. This commission came through an invitation from the British War Memorials Committee and from Lloyd George in 1918. The painting was to show the cooperation of American and British troops.
He travelled to the front and at first had a difficult time finding a subject that didn’t seem artificial and posed. He then witnessed the condition of victims of mustard gas attacks. Sargent supposed that the survivors of the gas attacks would encompass both British and American soldiers. He painted the soldiers in groups as he himself saw them brought in.
I know it took him several months to paint. It is oddly yellow, with an almost surreal look. It is certainly not the typical Sargent painting, but it is worth seeing in person should you ever have the opportunity.
Oh, and E. M. Forster didn’t like it. He said it looked too “heroic,” I have no idea what he meant. There is no heroism there, just suffering and IMO, an example of human compassion and cooperation in a time of great need.
And Russia begins mobilization to honor its treaty with Serbia. And Germany begins mobilizing to honor its treaty with Austria and to protect itself aganist France, because of the treaty between France and Russia. And England begins mobilizing because of its understanding with France, where France protects English interests in the Mediterranean and England looks out for France in north. Bang! The US steps in to be sure Germany-Austria are thoroughly humiliated, then skips town. Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Imperial Japan. Happy Anniversary Saravejo!
I know they aren’t really related, but the first thing I thought of when I saw the photo was John Singer Sargent’s painting Gassed. I saw it some years ago when it was on loan to the BMFA. This was a reminder of that massive and very powerful painting.
How that led to trench warfare in the fields of France is not something that is easily or logically explained. The only thing that comes to mind is that aspirations to empires by ruling elites had rendered them all totally delusional.
It’s this kind of behavior that is really worrisome when you see a large political faction denying basic scientific facts like evolution and climate change.
How deeply delusional are they? Do they not believe in nuclear radiation? Are they a little woozy on the biology of germs and viral diseases? (ok, they tend to batshit insane on biology but the point is still valid)
What bit of reality are they ignoring that is going to cost us a few million lives.
Please play nice in the Bathtub -- splash no soap in anyone's eyes. While your e-mail will not show with comments, note that it is our policy not to allow false e-mail addresses. Comments with non-working e-mail addresses may be deleted.
Or, until that account is unsuspended by the forces supporting Donald Trump: Follow @FillmoreWhite, the account of the Millard Fillmore White House Library
We've been soaking in the Bathtub for several months, long enough that some of the links we've used have gone to the Great Internet in the Sky.
If you find a dead link, please leave a comment to that post, and tell us what link has expired.
Thanks!
Retired teacher of law, economics, history, AP government, psychology and science. Former speechwriter, press guy and legislative aide in U.S. Senate. Former Department of Education. Former airline real estate, telecom towers, Big 6 (that old!) consultant. Lab and field research in air pollution control.
My blog, Millard Fillmore's Bathtub, is a continuing experiment to test how to use blogs to improve and speed up learning processes for students, perhaps by making some of the courses actually interesting. It is a blog for teachers, to see if we can use blogs. It is for people interested in social studies and social studies education, to see if we can learn to get it right. It's a blog for science fans, to promote good science and good science policy. It's a blog for people interested in good government and how to achieve it.
BS in Mass Communication, University of Utah
Graduate study in Rhetoric and Speech Communication, University of Arizona
JD from the National Law Center, George Washington University
[…] this is mostly an encore post. Fighting ignorance requires […]
LikeLike
Ed, I’m not sure how long ago this was. It was part of a huge exhibit of Sargent’s works at the BMFA. I’m thinking maybe 15 years ago? As an aside, I wish I were there. There’s a Chihuly exhibit going on right now.
Sargent was commissioned to do a painting to be part of an exhibit at the then planned Hall of Remembrance. This commission came through an invitation from the British War Memorials Committee and from Lloyd George in 1918. The painting was to show the cooperation of American and British troops.
He travelled to the front and at first had a difficult time finding a subject that didn’t seem artificial and posed. He then witnessed the condition of victims of mustard gas attacks. Sargent supposed that the survivors of the gas attacks would encompass both British and American soldiers. He painted the soldiers in groups as he himself saw them brought in.
I know it took him several months to paint. It is oddly yellow, with an almost surreal look. It is certainly not the typical Sargent painting, but it is worth seeing in person should you ever have the opportunity.
Oh, and E. M. Forster didn’t like it. He said it looked too “heroic,” I have no idea what he meant. There is no heroism there, just suffering and IMO, an example of human compassion and cooperation in a time of great need.
LikeLike
Ellie, the original Sargent painting is 20 feet by 7-1/2 feet — it was on tour in America, and I missed it?
I think the painting is a stunner. It ought to be in the Texas TEKS, but it’s not.
What else can you tell us about it?
LikeLike
And Russia begins mobilization to honor its treaty with Serbia. And Germany begins mobilizing to honor its treaty with Austria and to protect itself aganist France, because of the treaty between France and Russia. And England begins mobilizing because of its understanding with France, where France protects English interests in the Mediterranean and England looks out for France in north. Bang! The US steps in to be sure Germany-Austria are thoroughly humiliated, then skips town. Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Imperial Japan. Happy Anniversary Saravejo!
LikeLike
I know they aren’t really related, but the first thing I thought of when I saw the photo was John Singer Sargent’s painting Gassed. I saw it some years ago when it was on loan to the BMFA. This was a reminder of that massive and very powerful painting.
LikeLike
How that led to trench warfare in the fields of France is not something that is easily or logically explained. The only thing that comes to mind is that aspirations to empires by ruling elites had rendered them all totally delusional.
It’s this kind of behavior that is really worrisome when you see a large political faction denying basic scientific facts like evolution and climate change.
How deeply delusional are they? Do they not believe in nuclear radiation? Are they a little woozy on the biology of germs and viral diseases? (ok, they tend to batshit insane on biology but the point is still valid)
What bit of reality are they ignoring that is going to cost us a few million lives.
LikeLike