Anyone who votes Democrat regularly gets the “told you so” e-mails from Republicans making claims about how bad things are under President Obama.
One favorite, hoax meme is the claim that Obama hurt energy exploration in the U.S. One friend e-mails me at least once a month with a claim that Obama has done something to frustrate drilling for oil in the U.S., usually accompanied with a political pitch that all we need to do is drill the hell out of Alaska, kill the caribou, and allow pollution of the Gulf of Mexico, and we’ll be independent of Middle Eastern oil forever.
Here’s the ugly secret they don’t want to tell you — heck, they probably don’t know: Total oil rig count is way up under Obama from when he took office, increasing at a rate about double that of the previous Bush administration.
Under President Obama, oil and gas exploration in the U.S. is greatly increased.
Here’s the most recent rig count report from WTRG Economics, highlighting added:
North American Rotary Rig Counts
The U.S. rotary rig count was down 15 rigs at 2,001 for the week of November 18, 2011. It is 324 rigs (19.6%) higher than last year.
The number of rotary rigs drilling for oil decreased 8 to 1,125. There are 394 more rigs targeting oil than last year. Rigs drilling for oil represent 56.2% percent of all drilling activity.
Rigs directed toward natural gas were down 6 at 871. The number of rigs currently drilling for gas is 65 lower than last year’s level of 936.
Year-over-year oil exploration in the U.S. is up 53.9 percent. Gas exploration is down 6.9 percent. The weekly average of crude oil spot prices is 20.8 percent higher than last year and natural gas spot prices are 16.8 percent lower.
Tuesday a week ago I joined the high school economics teachers dining at the Dallas Federal Reserve Bank, the annual “Night at the Fed” event. The bank brought in Keith Phillips, a Senior Economist and Advisor from the San Antonio Branch to talk about “Where Will Your Students Find Jobs?”
One of his charts showed drill rig counts since 2000, on a slide, “Drilling Rig Count has Surged to High Levels.” Among other things, that partly explains why Texas was not so severely hit with the recession as the rest of the nation (though jobless counts in the past couple of months suggest Texas may catch up).
Sitting at the front table I could not help but be impressed with the rig count line. In 2000, when Bush came to office, there were about 300 active drilling rigs in the country, in oil and gas. Over seven years that count rose to about 1,000, then plunged in Bush’s last year in the economic downturn.
Obama came into office with a drill rig count just slightly higher than Bush had two terms previously. In three years, drill rig counts have climbed to near the height of the Bush administration’s best year, just under 1,000 (if I’m reading the chart correctly — and the piece above suggests I am).
Here’s the chart from Baker-Hughes — showing about the same rig count Dr. Phillips showed:
Here’s a more colorful, more clear version from EnergyDigger.com:
In other words, drill rigs have increased in the three years of the Obama administration at about double the rate of increase of the Bush administration.
When does Obama get credit for the increase in oil and gas exploration in the U.S. in his administration?
More, Resources:
Oh look…silence from Alan…
LikeLike
To quote Ed:
Remember, it was the U.S. who, as President Kennedy said, put a man on the Moon and returned him safely to the Earth. We value human life, and we don’t think that corporate profits should come at the expense of all other industries, human life, and human ways of life along the Gulf of Mexico.
Ed, you have to remember that Republicans only give a damn about life before it’s born. After it’s born said life can die by the thousands and republicans wouldn’t lift a finger to help.
As for you Alan I point you to these two sites:
http://www.indexmundi.com/g/g.aspx?c=us&v=95
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/us.html
The first one says that in 2008 the United States exported just over 1.62 million bbl per day.
As of 2010, according to the second site, the United States exported 9.688 million bbl per day. Now granted I’m no Charlie Eppes but last time I checked 9.6888 million is a bigger number then 1.62 million.
Now I point out that the second website is the CIA’s. Have fun arguing with the CIA, Alan.
Oh…and the first website got its info from the 2008 CIA world factbook.
Now I’m going to assume you’re not dingy enough to argue against the CIA, Alan. So would you like to acknowledge your mistake and apologize for it?
Or would that be expecting too much honesty from you?
LikeLike
Speaking of propaganda, and TASS and Pravda, that post over at the Heritage Foundation site is a real pip. It came at the end of 2010, and it suggests energy calamity for the U.S. if the drill regulating officials don’t back off and let oil companies run rampant through the deep waters of the Gulf of Mexico.
Clearly, that position is dead wrong now, even if it wasn’t total fantasy a year ago.
Alan graciously gave us the link; I graciously commented there, and the comment went into moderation.
Will Heritage Foundation ever let the facts see the light of day?
It’ll be interesting to watch and see.
LikeLike
Let’s be clear on the facts:
1. In three years, drill rig counts under the Obama administration equal the drill rig counts of the 8 years of the Bush administration — oil and natural gas exploration is among the healthiest of U.S. industries.
2. Domestic oil production has increased each year of the Obama administration, a stark contrast to the decreases in domestic oil production in each of the Bush administration years.
3. In February, the U.S. became an oil exporting nation once again.
4. Last year, in a risky venture, BP and Transocean mismanaged a deepwater drilling project and nearly wiped out the fishing and seafood industries in the U.S. portion of the Gulf of Mexico, cost the nation more than $20 billion dollars, and killed 11 people in the catastrophic explosions that kicked off the disaster that continues to this day.
So, I point out that it’s false to claim that Obama is to blame for oil production declines, since oil production didn’t decline, oil exploration rose, and even in the Gulf of Mexico there is only a modest decline in deepwater drilling.
Alan said:
Alan? You’re looking in a mirror, Kindly re-evaluate.
Yeah, the Heritage
FascistFoundation group is partly right: Oil exploration in the deepwaters of the Gulf have been appropriately slowed trying to prevent a replay of the disaster of 2010. No, HF is wrong, that’s not Obama’s fault — it’s to Obama’s credit. No, it’s not a serious block of energy exploration in the U.S., it’s a rational evaluation of whether and how deepwater exploration and production can be done safely. Remember, it was the U.S. who, as President Kennedy said, put a man on the Moon and returned him safely to the Earth. We value human life, and we don’t think that corporate profits should come at the expense of all other industries, human life, and human ways of life along the Gulf of Mexico.In the meantime: Oil exploration is up. Oil production is up, way up over the Bush administration. The U.S. is now exporting oil, and the oil industry is very, very healthy on Obama’s watch.
P.S.: Please turn in your TASS credentials; they are no good anymore.
LikeLike
Ed Darrell,
” You know, Alan, you’ve got a loser position there. You’re trying to blame Obama, falsely, for energy woes of the country. ”
Tell me, in another life did you work for TASS or Pravda? You are quite talented at putting out misinformation.
So your hero, Barak Hussein Obama is an advocate of Sarah Palin’s ” drill baby drill ” ? So how do you splain last December’s ban on drilling in the eastern Gulf and off of the coasts of the Atlantic and Pacific?????
http://blog.heritage.org/2010/12/01/seven-years-of-bad-policy-government-maintains-offshore-drilling-ban/
Again , I say the rig count is up in spite of President Obama, not because of as you say .
And, just because there may be a lot of offshore rigs, it does not follow that they are all in the best places for producing oil .
You may convince your uninformed readers that Obama has not damaged America’s energy position, but it is an insult to the intelligence of the rest of us .
LikeLike
You know, Alan, you’ve got a loser position there. You’re trying to blame Obama, falsely, for energy woes of the country.
But the chief measure of our energy capability at any given moment is drill rig count. Obama’s drill rig count has expanded to equal George Bush’s 8-year total, in just three years.
You might want to look at actual oil and gas production in the U.S., because surely, were your claims close to accurate, the “new rules and restrictions” imposed by the Obama administration (really leftover Bushies, but we can discuss that some other time) must have hurt production, especially with the “ban on drilling” in the Gulf (another hoax).
Yes, let’s look at domestic production:
Oops. Your claim loses again.
LikeLike
Ed Darrell,
Alas, I can’t find my link to the article, but this one will have to do,
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/11/16/regulation-nation-shell-ready-to-move-on-alaska-wells-if-alphabet-soup/
Again, I disbelieve everything you have said .
LikeLike
Ed says, I gave you the report from the Federal Reserve
Yes, you did. And you were correct. I’m not sure how Alan will respond but would you care to take bets on how long before the Paultards make their appearance, fuliminating about Jewish bankers and one world government?
The Fed is Satan’s trick, you know… @@
LikeLike
I think your figures are not solid.
Alan said:
All we have to do is sacrifice 20,000 Alaskans, their food supplies, and the natural resource of Alaska that could be renewable in wildlife and surface value — and if we do, if your figures are right, we get a modest bump in world oil supply and a negligible improvement in gasoline prices.
But, alas, your claim of 27 billion barrels is pie in the sky speculation, even if we decided to sacrifice the 20,000 people.
Got different figures? Bring ’em, with good citations.
Wikipedia has the summary:
USGS has a less hopeful view than you, based on pragmatic considerations of oil extraction and more recent assessments of the amount of oil available:
So, in summary:
1. Your estimate of oil recoverable is very high, 50% to 200% higher than USGS estimates.
2. Recovery of the oil threatens aquatic and land mammals, including those local populations depend on.
3. All local peoples are opposed to drilling there, because they say it will destroy their tribes and families. These are the people other than the oil companies who would most benefit from drilling, by the way.
4. Assuming your high estimates, the amount of additional oil available is negligible to extremely modest.
5. Even without drilling the Arctic, Obama’s way ahead of Bush on increasing oil exploration and oil production. So any way you slice it, the claim Obama is “anti-oil” or “anti-exploration” is false, based on the facts on the ground, especially the number of drill rigs actually used to explore for oil.
LikeLike
American Thinker? What, the Pravda site was down? Your Saga subscription lapsed? Mad was unavailable to you?
I gave you the report from the Federal Reserve, and I backed it up with the figures from Baker-Hughes, the most authoritative tracker of drilling in the world. If you have some challenge to their figures, can you bring us a serious source to challenge it?
The reason I bother with this is precisely to show the hoax claims you’re making are false. I bother with this “obvious deception precisely because you and others try to make it, and because you deny you’re trying to deceive. It’s always possible that you are simply among the gullibly misled, of course. In that case, you need the information that you are being deceived by “an obvious deception,” so you can correct those who deceive you, and not be deceived yourself.
LikeLike
Ed Darrell,
” One favorite, hoax meme is the claim that Obama hurt energy exploration in the U.S. ”
Again, why do you still bother with this obvious deception ? Sometimes Obama does not even have to use his Kommissars in government to do his dirty work. His allies in the flat earth environmental idiot movement just bury the oil companies in law suits. You know, like they do the nuke plants?
Example, There are 27 Billion barrels of oil just waiting for Shell oil to come and get off of the coast of Alaska. Shell has spent $4 Billion and wasted 5 years on this. That is a pretty good reserve to add to US supplies. But alas it is not to be.
Also according to The American Thinker your hero Obama has his Interior Department delaying permits and stalling drilling in the Gulf. Now either the American Thinker or you are in serious error . I just do not know who to believe.
LikeLike
Your stock-in-trade is misunderstanding the facts before you, and mis-stating those facts you may happen to understand, isn’t it.
Is there anything you say that isn’t exactly the opposite of the truth, if you know it?
I’m no more anti-oil than John D. Rockefeller, the first. But I do pay attention to the facts, the better to make good policy, as Rockefeller would have noted.
LikeLike
A cloud behind every silver lining, eh, Alan?
Here are the facts for the Gulf of Mexico, as of April 2011 — the decreases seem logical to me, considering the complete breakdown of regulation and the catastrophic failure of oil companies to police themselves in the lawless period leading up to the BP/Transocean disaster
So there is no really great decrease there, either.
But confronted with the facts, that oil and gas drilling has accelerated under Obama at twice the rate of expansion under George Bush, it’s interesting that you pick on the one area where there needed to be much greater control, and you complain about slightly greater control.
700 or so drill rigs up, you complain about five down.
Not only is your glass half-empty rather than half-full, you’re claiming the water is bad, too.
Overall, the disaster in the Gulf was a disaster for oil companies, too — and despite that, the Obama administration is not far off the pace of the go-go Bush administration in the Gulf. Drilling is “on the mend” in the Gulf, according to the experts:
You’re crying crocodile tears. And that troubles me. Alligators are much more American. The gators are doing fine.
LikeLike
Ed Darrell,
As usual your posts are deceptive . El Presidentee Obama has dis couraged drilling off shore . If the rig count is up during the Obama regime it is in spite of not because of our fearless leader . He did close off huge tracks to exploration. He halted drilling offshore for awhile after the BP little leak. Since you hate all oil production, why do you even bother with this deception. You are a global warming, fossil fuel hating greenie. Be proud of what you are.
LikeLike
Ed,
You seem capable enough to cherry pick. Because you cherry pick, you censor.
Further, as I’ve said before, other sites do not seem to be having your problem – it is you, Ed.
Further, as I’ve said before, if you don’t know how to do it, ask. This is not a mystery.
LikeLike
Quod erat demonstrandum.
I take it, Black Flag, that you’d rather I not spend any time rescuing your posts from the spam filters. I don’t know what you did exactly to convince the filter you’re a threat, or spam, but you’ve demonstrated only that I have more patience with you than a machine designed to prevent offensive and inane posts from hitting this blog.
If your posts ever see the light of day again, it’s only out of mercy or pity, and my coincidentally noticing you’re not actively promoting child porn.
LikeLike
Ed,
Then you are admitting you are using it to censor me.
I retract my statement previously.
You are censoring and you are a coward.
LikeLike
I’ll take advice from someone who can demonstrate citizenship and self-control. Black Flag, you ingrate, you are not that person.
Fix your manners.
Stick to what you know about — and spam filters aren’t your forte by any stretch.
But of course, if you stuck to what you know about, you’d be silent.
BF, you don’t have the guts to demonstrate manners, the common sense to be anything but a troll, I fear. Prove me wrong.
LikeLike
And fix your spam filter – or are you really using it as a censorship tool and hiding behind it?
LikeLike
No one who drills for oil in Alaska does that to kill caribou – the ol’ Socialist rant of whatever a Socialist does not like, he misdirects the argument from the truth -where he cannot win- into emotion, where he is the master of irrational appeals.
Next, it is obvious that oil prices determines drilling rig utilization – so, really, you are saying that due to Obama actions, you pay more for oil then you did before!
What has decreased is offshore drilling – and that is directly due to Obama – and that is probably what your friend is referring to, but as you failed to actually provide his text, all we know is you are making up stories as you usually do.
LikeLike